<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smashing Magazine Logo Contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/</link>
	<description>Knowledge comes from inspiration - one bit at a time</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Tough choice! There are so many of them that I like ... :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough choice! There are so many of them that I like &#8230; <img src='http://www.inspirationbit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>I personally like #1 because it's very simple. I'm a very simple kind of person and it takes very little to impress me. The arrow on the G is quite creative and maybe that's why I like #1.

The rest of the logos I found creative just because logos are very hard to come up with. For me, it's hard to even think of a logo, but to design one? Now that's creative. All the logos are very unique so that's why I said that they were all creative. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like #1 because it&#8217;s very simple. I&#8217;m a very simple kind of person and it takes very little to impress me. The arrow on the G is quite creative and maybe that&#8217;s why I like #1.</p>
<p>The rest of the logos I found creative just because logos are very hard to come up with. For me, it&#8217;s hard to even think of a logo, but to design one? Now that&#8217;s creative. All the logos are very unique so that&#8217;s why I said that they were all creative. <img src='http://www.inspirationbit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 18:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-941</guid>
		<description>Okay Ibit, you sound like the designer. Oh wait, You Are a Designer. If you get enough comments on this post it would be interesting to see which one your readers pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay Ibit, you sound like the designer. Oh wait, You Are a Designer. If you get enough comments on this post it would be interesting to see which one your readers pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibit</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>ibit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-937</guid>
		<description>it's interesting to note how your comment is a complete opposite to all the points I've tried to make in this post.
Why do you personally like #1 the most, Jess? And what did you find creative in all those logos: the colours, the originality, the concept, ...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s interesting to note how your comment is a complete opposite to all the points I&#8217;ve tried to make in this post.<br />
Why do you personally like #1 the most, Jess? And what did you find creative in all those logos: the colours, the originality, the concept, &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Very impressive! I personally like #1 the most, but they're all very creative logos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very impressive! I personally like #1 the most, but they&#8217;re all very creative logos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspiral Logos &#187; Blog Archive Rickmann Design</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspiral Logos &#187; Blog Archive Rickmann Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 09:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-924</guid>
		<description>[...] Inspiration bit has an interesting critique of the Smashing Magazine logo contest. While I agree with her assessment of these contests as a whole I also thing the results can be very interesting when done publicly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Inspiration bit has an interesting critique of the Smashing Magazine logo contest. While I agree with her assessment of these contests as a whole I also thing the results can be very interesting when done publicly. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Huereca</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Huereca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>I personally liked #8 with the orange look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally liked #8 with the orange look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar Ganesh</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Shankar Ganesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>I'm not a designer, and dunno anything about such stuff, but on seeing the logos, I liked the last one on that page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a designer, and dunno anything about such stuff, but on seeing the logos, I liked the last one on that page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibit</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>ibit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 06:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>You sound like a designer with a modern flair :-)
I do agree about that logo's simplicity, but I don't like the difference in words baseline positioning and to me the two words look too disjointed. If Smashing was a name of an actual magazine, then it would make sense to make the word Smashing stand out and use only the letter S in the logo's symbol. But in this case, "Smashing Magazine" is the blog's title and should be unified in the logo's design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound like a designer with a modern flair <img src='http://www.inspirationbit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I do agree about that logo&#8217;s simplicity, but I don&#8217;t like the difference in words baseline positioning and to me the two words look too disjointed. If Smashing was a name of an actual magazine, then it would make sense to make the word Smashing stand out and use only the letter S in the logo&#8217;s symbol. But in this case, &#8220;Smashing Magazine&#8221; is the blog&#8217;s title and should be unified in the logo&#8217;s design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 05:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspirationbit.com/smashing-magazine-logo-contest/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>I liked the logo by Roland Hidvegi the best. They put it at number 8. I think it is clean and simple but with a modern flair. Do I sound like a designer? I think not but I like it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the logo by Roland Hidvegi the best. They put it at number 8. I think it is clean and simple but with a modern flair. Do I sound like a designer? I think not but I like it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
